Who we are

  Membership

  NEW Events

  PAST Events

  Documentation

  Essay Prize

  MEMBERS

  Member Benefits

  LIDC Website

 
Competition Law Association


CLA: Index of Downloadable Documentation (public access)
The following documents are copyright. They are made available freely for consultation on this website but may not be reproduced without permission.



Submissions


Consultation Response
BIS: Implementing the EU Directive on damages for breach of competition law 
Date: March 2016
Author: CLA 

Download

Consultation Response
CAT rules: further details on Question 8 
Date: July 2015
Author: CLA 

Download

Consultation Response
CAT further rules of procedure 
Date: July 2015
Author: CLA 

Download

Consultation Response
BIS: Streamlining Regulatory & Competition Appeals
Date: September 2013
Author: CLA

Download

Consultation Response
European Commission : Draft Proposal for a revised block exemption for technology transfer agreements and for revised guidelines
Date: May 2013
Author: CLA

Download

Consultation Response
BIS: Private Actions in Competition Law
A Consultation on Options for Reform
Date: July 2012
Author: CLA

Download

Consultation Response to European Commission White Paper on damages actions for breach of the EC anti trust rules
Date: August 2008
Author: CLA

Download

The OFT draft guidance consultation document Mergers - Jurisdictional and Procedural Guidance (The Consultation Document)
Date: June 2008
Author: CLA

Download

Comments in response to the discussion document The deterrence effect of competition enforcement by the OFT, November 2007 (“OFT Consultation Document”)
Date: January 2008
Author: CLA

Download

Settlement Procedure for Cartels: CLA's submission in response to the Commission's call for comments
Date: December 2007
Author: James Dilley of Martineau Johnson

Download

Submission to OFT Consultation in relation to proposed revision to 'Mergers: Substantive Assessment Guidance'
Date: August 2007
Author: Christopher Brown of Farrer & Co

Download

Submission of the Competition Law Association to the Office of Fair Trading in response to the OFT's paper "Private Actions in Competition Law: Effective Redress for Consumers and Business
Date: June 2007
Authors: Please click here

Download

Submission of the Competition Law Association to the European Commission, DG Comp, on their draft Consolidated Jurisdictional Notice under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004
Date: December 2006
Authors: Please click here

Download

Submission of the Competition Law Association to the European Committee of the House of Lords in response to its Call for Evidence on an EU Competition Court
Date: November 2006
Authors: Please click here

Download

Submission of the Competition Law Association to the European Commission, DG COMP, on their draft Notice on Immunity from Fines and Reduction of Fines in Cartel Cases
Date: November 2006
Authors: Please click here

Download

Submission to the European Commission on their draft Discussion Paper on the Application of Article 82 of the Treaty to Exclusionary Abuses
Date: April 2006
Authors: Please click here

Download

Response to the OFT Consultation on the Draft Annual Plan 2006-2007
Date: February 2006
Author: CLA

Download



LIDC Documents


UK National Reports for LIDC Congress 2015, Stockholm

Question B: The food distribution market: is anti-trust efficiently handling this market?

Download

UK National Reports for LIDC Congress 2014,Turin

Question A: The consistency and compatibility of transactional resolutions of anti-trust proceedings (such as settlement processes, leniencies, transactions, commitments, and amicable agreements) with the due process and fundamental rights of the parties.  

Download

UK National Reports for LIDC Congress 2014,Turin

Question B: To what extent does the principle of exhaustion of IP rights apply to the on-line industry?  

Download

UK National Reports for LIDC Congress 2013, Kiev

Question A: The food distribution market: is anti-trust efficiently handling this market?

Download

UK National Reports for LIDC Congress 2012, Prague

Question A: Should or could small or medium-sized undertakings be subject to other or specific competition rules?

Download

UK National Reports for LIDC Congress 2011, Oxford, UK

Question A: What are the most important factors that should determine the level of fines imposed for infringements of the competition rules (e.g. cooperation, compliance programmes, impace of the infringement, previous infringements and/or deterrence?)Should there be a binding framework determining the level of fine and who should decide the framework (e.g. judges, competition authorities, ministers and/or some other independent body)?

Download

Question B: To what extent should on-line intermediaries (such as ISPs and operators of online market places) be responsible for the control or prohibition of unfair competitive practices (in particular sales of products contrary to the law) carried out on their systems?

Download

UK National Reports for LIDC Congress 2010, Bordeaux

Question A: Which, if any, agreements, practices or information exchanges about prices should be prohibited in vertical relationships?

Download

Question B: To what extent can intellectual property rights (trademarks, patents, designs, copyrights, designations of origin) limit comparative advertising?

Download

UK National Reports for LIDC Congress 2009, Vienna

Question A: Should a competition authority enjoy an unfettered discretionary power in the context of the investigation of competition law infringements, or should its margin of discretion be subject to certain limits?

Download

Question B: What are the criteria that determine the unfairness of so-called ‘look-alikes’; what are the prohibitions and the appropriate sanctions?

Download

UK National Reports for LIDC Congress 2008, Hamburg

Question B: Under which circumstances and to what extent should the positive obligation of providing information be imposed by regulation on advertisers?

Download

Fidelity Discounts and Rebates not Justified by the Costs: In which cases should a dominant enterprise be forbidden such practices?

Download

UK National Reports for LIDC Congress 2006, Amsterdam

Question A: Should private enforcement of antitrust law be encouraged and, if so, how?

Download

Amsterdam Summary responses to the questionnaire

Download



 
Legal Information | Search | Contact Us